screening sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress in the greenhouse and field conditions

Authors

حمیدرضا ابراهیمیان

مربی پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان

abstract

for optimum utilization of saline soil and water resources, various methods have been proposed. application of best management practices and selection of salt tolerant cultivars are two important issues. selection and breeding for salt tolerant cultivars require potential genetic materials, screening and evaluation of them in laboratory and field experiments. starting in 2000, 80 sugar beet genetic genotypes(iranian sugar beet seed institute) were evaluated for salt tolerance in the greenhouse and field conditions. each year 20 genotypes consisting of multigerm, diploid, tetrapolid, otype and monogerm genotypes were evaluated in the greenhouse condition using split plot based on randomized complet block design with two replications, treated with 8, 16 and 24 ds/m irrigation water. the germination- rate was determined after 4 to 5 weeks and the genotypes were classified for salt tolerance.in another experiment, the genotypes were evaluated in two separate randomized complete block design with four replications, in roudasht agricultural salinity station in the field condition using 8 and 12 ds/m water for irrigation in a soil with initial ece of 8±1 and 12±1 ds/m, respectively. at the end of growing season, traits such as root yield, sugar content, and sugar yield were determined. at the end of four years, data were pooled and the genotypes were evaluated based on salt stress tolerance index. to minimize the effect of year and environment, the relative amounts were calculated for each year yield and some quality traits. the results of greenhouse trials showed that there were significant difference for germination rate among genotyes only in 2001. based on field experiments, there were significant differences among genotypes for root yield, sugar content and white sugar content in 8 ds/m or 12ds/m or both levels. results showed that the most proper level for evaluating genotypes in the field conditions was 12ds/m. on the basis of sti, genotypes  9671-p.11, 9597-p.1 and otype 231 for gemination, and  9669-p.24, bp karadj, 9671-p.10, bp mashad and 9597-p3  for white sugar content were evaluated as tolerant. among them, bp mashad with the highest sti was the best genotype.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Sugar Beet Genotypes Grouping under Normal and Saline Conditions

For ranking and grouping of full-sibs and hybrids of sugar beet obtained from breeding programs, two separate experiments were carried out at the farm of the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Station of Miandoab in 2017 under saline and normal conditions. For this purpose, 17 full-sibs and 28 hybrids differing in resistance and susceptibility to environmental stresses were investigate...

full text

The Effect of Salinity Stress on Full-sib Progeny of Sugar Beet in Field Condition

Considering the effect of salinity stress on the quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet genotypes, it seems necessary to study the response of genotypes obtained from breeding programs to salinity stress. For this purpose, 17 full-sib genotypes (derived from sibling crossing) with 7 different tolerant control under two salinity stress (electrical conductivity 17.36 dsm) and without s...

full text

Greenhouse and Field Screening for Salinity Tolerance

Developing alfalfa varieties with tolerance to salinity requires a multi-prong research approach. Because of the complexity of the plant by environment interaction a combination of laboratory, field and greenhouse selection techniques is most effective in addressing this complicated trait. At Forage Genetics our breeding strategy for salinity tolerance includes high throughput laboratory and gr...

full text

evaluation of resistance of some sugar beet genotypes to beet cyst nematode under greenhouse conditions

resistance of 11 genotypes of sugar beet to cyst nematode was evaluated in two separate greenhouse experiments in completely randomized design. in each experiment, 50 seedlings of each genotype were inoculated with 1000 nematode larves in several times. after 9 weeks, the number of cysts on each plant was counted. data were analyzed with sas program. the results showed that the genotypes differ...

full text

seed germination, plant establishment, and yield of sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress

it is well known that sugar beet is sensitive to salinity stress at the germination stage. three separate experiments were conducted to study the effects of salinity on seed germination, plant establishment, and yield of sugar beet genotypes for screening purposes. these included: (a) a laboratory study using four water salinity levels (with ec values < 0.1 as the control, 16, 20, and 24 ds m-1...

full text

evaluation of drought tolerance indices in determining sugar beet genotypes under early season drought stress conditions

this study was conducted over a three-year period (1998, 1999 and 2000) to evaluate some drought tolerance indices and their relations with sugar yield in some sugar beet genotypes under early season drought and non-drought conditions. the experimental design was a split plot with a randomized complete block. the main plots consisted of two irrigation regimes: non-stress and water stress in ear...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
چغندرقند

جلد ۲۴، شماره ۱، صفحات ۲۱-۱

Keywords
[ ' f o r o p t i m u m u t i l i z a t i o n o f s a l i n e s o i l a n d w a t e r r e s o u r c e s ' , ' v a r i o u s m e t h o d s h a v e b e e n p r o p o s e d . a p p l i c a t i o n o f b e s t m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e s a n d s e l e c t i o n o f s a l t t o l e r a n t c u l t i v a r s a r e t w o i m p o r t a n t i s s u e s . s e l e c t i o n a n d b r e e d i n g f o r s a l t t o l e r a n t c u l t i v a r s r e q u i r e p o t e n t i a l g e n e t i c m a t e r i a l s ' , ' s c r e e n i n g a n d e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e m i n l a b o r a t o r y a n d f i e l d e x p e r i m e n t s . s t a r t i n g i n 2 0 0 0 ' , ' 8 0 s u g a r b e e t g e n e t i c g e n o t y p e s ( i r a n i a n s u g a r b e e t s e e d i n s t i t u t e ) w e r e e v a l u a t e d f o r s a l t t o l e r a n c e i n t h e g r e e n h o u s e a n d f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s . e a c h y e a r 2 0 g e n o t y p e s c o n s i s t i n g o f m u l t i g e r m ' , ' d i p l o i d ' , ' t e t r a p o l i d ' , ' o t y p e a n d m o n o g e r m g e n o t y p e s w e r e e v a l u a t e d i n t h e g r e e n h o u s e c o n d i t i o n u s i n g s p l i t p l o t b a s e d o n r a n d o m i z e d c o m p l e t b l o c k d e s i g n w i t h t w o r e p l i c a t i o n s ' , ' t r e a t e d w i t h 8 ' , ' 1 6 a n d 2 4 d s / m i r r i g a t i o n w a t e r . t h e g e r m i n a t i o n ' , ' r a t e w a s d e t e r m i n e d a f t e r 4 t o 5 w e e k s a n d t h e g e n o t y p e s w e r e c l a s s i f i e d f o r s a l t t o l e r a n c e . i n a n o t h e r e x p e r i m e n t ' , ' t h e g e n o t y p e s w e r e e v a l u a t e d i n t w o s e p a r a t e r a n d o m i z e d c o m p l e t e b l o c k d e s i g n w i t h f o u r r e p l i c a t i o n s ' , ' i n r o u d a s h t a g r i c u l t u r a l s a l i n i t y s t a t i o n i n t h e f i e l d c o n d i t i o n u s i n g 8 a n d 1 2 d s / m w a t e r f o r i r r i g a t i o n i n a s o i l w i t h i n i t i a l e c e o f 8 ± 1 a n d 1 2 ± 1 d s / m ' , ' r e s p e c t i v e l y . a t t h e e n d o f g r o w i n g s e a s o n ' , ' t r a i t s s u c h a s r o o t y i e l d ' , ' s u g a r c o n t e n t ' , ' a n d s u g a r y i e l d w e r e d e t e r m i n e d . a t t h e e n d o f f o u r y e a r s ' , ' d a t a w e r e p o o l e d a n d t h e g e n o t y p e s w e r e e v a l u a t e d b a s e d o n s a l t s t r e s s t o l e r a n c e i n d e x . t o m i n i m i z e t h e e f f e c t o f y e a r a n d e n v i r o n m e n t ' , ' t h e r e l a t i v e a m o u n t s w e r e c a l c u l a t e d f o r e a c h y e a r y i e l d a n d s o m e q u a l i t y t r a i t s . t h e r e s u l t s o f g r e e n h o u s e t r i a l s s h o w e d t h a t t h e r e w e r e s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e f o r g e r m i n a t i o n r a t e a m o n g g e n o t y e s o n l y i n 2 0 0 1 . b a s e d o n f i e l d e x p e r i m e n t s ' , ' t h e r e w e r e s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s a m o n g g e n o t y p e s f o r r o o t y i e l d ' , ' s u g a r c o n t e n t a n d w h i t e s u g a r c o n t e n t i n 8 d s / m o r 1 2 d s / m o r b o t h l e v e l s . r e s u l t s s h o w e d t h a t t h e m o s t p r o p e r l e v e l f o r e v a l u a t i n g g e n o t y p e s i n t h e f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s w a s 1 2 d s / m . o n t h e b a s i s o f s t i ' , ' g e n o t y p e s x a 0 9 6 7 1 ' , ' p . 1 1 ' , 9 5 9 7 , ' p . 1 a n d o t y p e 2 3 1 f o r g e m i n a t i o n ' , ' a n d x a 0 9 6 6 9 ' , ' p . 2 4 ' , ' b p x a 0 k a r a d j ' , 9 6 7 1 , ' p . 1 0 ' , ' b p x a 0 m a s h a d a n d 9 5 9 7 ' , ' p 3 x a 0 f o r w h i t e s u g a r c o n t e n t w e r e e v a l u a t e d a s t o l e r a n t . a m o n g t h e m ' , ' b p x a 0 m a s h a d w i t h t h e h i g h e s t s t i w a s t h e b e s t g e n o t y p e . ' ]

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023